01 March, 2007

Milblogs and Patterns of Community

In a post about networking and alliances in warfare, Global Guerrilla mentions the work of Valdis Krebs on social networking. It offers a fascinating analysis that applies to blogging, especially topic-centric blogging such as that of milblogs. It certainly tracks directly with my experience in the milblogs. The diagram he supplies--on the left--includes four types of nodes (definitions taken from the link above):

  • Yellow nodes: leadership. These people are the core leadership of the organization. "They have denser connections to other leaders" and other main network nodes. They keep everything together as the group's connectors.
  • Red nodes: active members. Active members are tightly connected to the leadership nodes (yellow). They, in combination with the yellows, are what people refer to as the "group."
  • Blue nodes: people actively seeking membership. These people aren't formally connected to the core group. They are actively working on ways (relationships, credibility, etc.) to connect to the "group."
  • Green nodes: lurkers and potential members. People in this category are not active members of the group. They may or may not undertake actions that are in line with group goals.
I think I'm in the Red node, but I'm not sure. However, it reminds me of my realization yesterday that I have met in "real space" (and have various levels of continuing interaction with) six out of my eight fellow Milbloggie winners--the only two I don't really know are relatively new bloggers. Fascinating.

It's well worth reading the whole post (and comments) about this model's application to modern warfare.

[H/T to Ry for the link and John (in comments) for its application to blogging]

Read More......

Media and the Medal of Honor

I haven't written about Bruce Crandall's Medal of Honor here. Probably largely because I haven't had time to more than scan the posts and stories I've read about him. Others have covered it far more ably than I would. But strange that few of those who would do it "far more ably" are in the major media...

Mr. Crandall, then a major, commanded a company with the 229th Assault Helicopter Battalion, carrying soldiers to a landing zone, called X-ray, in the la Drang Valley. An assault from the North Vietnamese army erupted, as described at the White House ceremony Monday. Three soldiers on Maj. Crandall's helicopter were killed. He kept it on the ground while four wounded were taken aboard. Back at base, he asked for a volunteer to return with him to X-ray. Capt. Ed Freeman came forward. Through smoke and bullets, they flew in and out 14 times, spent 14 hours in the air and used three helicopters. They evacuated 70 wounded. The battalion survived.

...In a less doubtful culture, Maj. Crandall's magnificent medal would have been on every front page, if only a photograph. It was on no one's front page Tuesday. The New York Times, the culture's lodestar, had a photograph on its front page of President Bush addressing governors about an insurance plan. Maj. Crandall's Medal of Honor was on page 15, in a round-up, three lines from the bottom. Other big-city dailies also ran it in their news summaries; some--the Washington Post, USA Today--ran full accounts inside.

There's been a lot of talk lately about being tired. I think I'm very, very tired of fighting something as hopeless as a major media culture that buries the story of a living MoH recipient on page 15...

More about LTC (ret) Crandall at Blackfive and Righty in a Lefty State incl. video), and superb coverage at the official Army site.

Read More......

28 February, 2007

Walter Reed Follow-up

I don't have time to write myself, but have been reading some excellent, thought-provoking posts by people with knowledge and experience on the subject of the aftermath of the WaPo stories.

TC Override (Chuck):

Wow. Use the chain-of-command to help you fix problems. Novel Idea! I'm glad no one ever thought of THAT before. I think the reson for so much despair, and all the trouble at WRAMC is because these stupid cripples were too dumb to just ask their chain of command for help. [/sarcasm] I believe the chain - of - fellow - wounded - placed - in - the - chain - of - command was a big problem before. Is that getting fixed?

The Armorer:

Appropriate action may have been taken - and if it was, well, someone ought to report it. I don't have to have the name - I just want to know that officer careers imploded as thoroughly (actually moreso) as the NCO careers did. From where I sit, as a commissioned officer of the United States Army, currently without assignment, there is a disturbing lack of commissioned scalps hanging from the pike at the gate.

And if that is in fact true - it is a failure of leadership at the higher levels at WRAMC. REMFs, indeed.

Read the comments at the links above for more excellent discussion (also here--a repost).

Read More......

Overheard at the Mini Mart

Two older NCO Marines exchange warm greetings. They obviously haven't seen each other for awhile...

Marine #1: So, how's it going?!

Marine #2: Good! Getting ready to head out again...

Marine #1: Going back to... ?

Marine #2 [voice trailing off]: Yeah, back to.... yeah. 'Bout two months... And you?

Marine #1: Good! They just tried to get me to re-up.

Marine #2: You goin' to?

Marine #1: Nah, retiring. It'll be 20 years in '08.... They keep telling me... "We need you... Promotion... $10,000 [signing bonus]!!!"

[chuckles] I told him, "If I'm in this job for the money, I shouldn't be doing it."

Marine #2 [softly and contemplatively]: True...

Read More......

As Requested

Here you go...


If I had Photoshop, I'd add the blushing, too. ;)

Read More......

27 February, 2007

A Milbloggie!

Wow.

[That up there is little Fuzzybear's surprised reaction to winning a MilBloggie, 'cause when she asked for your support she thought she'd just "be competitive" and maybe have some fun... not actually win the darn thing!]

And what's a Milbloggie?

The purpose each year is to recognize military bloggers for their contribution to blogging, news and information, and to the military over the past year.

A huge "Thank you!" to all who voted; your support means a lot to me.

I'm at a loss for words...

Other than to say congrats to my fellow winners. You're amazing and I'm honored to be in your company:

Army: Acute Politics
Air Force: Afghanistan Without a Clue
Navy: Doc in the Box
Marine Corps: SandGram
Military (Veteran): Blackfive - The Paratrooper of Love
Civilian: Soldiers' Angels Germany
Military (Spouse): Andi
Military (Parent): Some Soldier's Mom

Read More......

An American Hero

Enlisted at 17... a Marine's Marine... Superman to his daughter... hero to the family of a wounded Marine... 23 years of service... Sergeant Major of Marines...

Joseph J. Ellis, rest in peace.

His fellow Marine, a Patriot Guard rider:

Sergeant Major Ellis was a great man. He was a Marine's Marine. Prior Force Recon, did it all and asked for more. I served under him when I was a young Sergeant as an instructor at the School Of Infantry. We all watched together the planes fly into the Towers on 911. Joe Ellis made a huge impact on my life as a Marine, as well as my personal life. He went to bat for me on a few occasions and helped me out of a pickle.

He used to ask me, "What did you do today, to prepare?" He pushed us Sergeants hard because he knew it was his job. He loved the Marine Corps and he loved the Marines under him. I found out only 15 minutes ago he was killed and I pain in the thought our paths won't ever cross again in the Corps.

I am asking, if possible, any of my fellow riders who will attend this ride if one would send me a funeral program and the documents handed out. It is with regret I can not attend his funeral as I am active duty at the Mountain Warfare Training Center in Cali. This would mean the world to me.

To the family of Sergeant Major Ellis,
I grieve with you. I am sorry for your loss. I will miss him dearly all the rest of my days. Sgt Maj Ellis was a great Marine and he was my friend. I pray that the Lord is with your family at your time of sorrow.

Sgt Maj, Ill meet you at the gates.

Staff Sergeant Ducharme
Semper Fi

His daughter:

[He] was always "healthy and alive," a perfectionist in what he did and who made anything seem possible. "I always thought he wouldn't be one of those people who wouldn't come home," Rachael Ellis, 20, said Monday. "In my eyes, he was superman."

...With additional education, Ellis could have moved up even further, Rachael said, but as an officer, he wouldn't have been as hands-on. She said all three of his tours of duty to Iraq weren't mandatory; he volunteered.

"He just wanted to make a difference," she said. "Anytime he was asked to go somewhere, even times when he didn't have to, he would. He wanted to be there for his troops."

Father of the wounded marine:

David Emery said his son's sergeant major, Joseph J. Ellis, of Battalion Landing Team 2nd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, appeared to have realized that a man pushing into a crowd near Ellis and David Emery Jr. was an insurgent. Emery said he was told by Marine Corps officials that Ellis got between the suicide bomber and his son. Ellis was killed by the bomb.

"I think of him as a hero," David Emery said of Ellis, a 40-year-old Marine from Ashland, Ohio. "He saw him pushing his way through the crowd. He moved to get this guy and probably saved my son's life."

He was buried in Arlington National Cemetery on February 21, 2007.

Read More......

Milbloggies: Vote Now (please)!

[Updated: Info/links corrected. This will stay on top until Tuesday--originally posted Feb 22.]

I made it through the nomination process, thanks to nine wonderful readers!

Today the voting begins in earnest, and I'm gonna need more than nine votes to win this thing. Voting ends on the Tuesday the 27th at 8p.m. eastern. Yeah, I know you have to register at Military.com to vote, but its a small thing... and you can just "unregister" right after you vote (Shhh! Don't tell JP).

So, how about giving a girl something to smile about...?

Vote here, please.

Read More......

26 February, 2007

One More Time...

Today is the last day of voting for the Milbloggies. Voting ends at 8:00 eastern. I'll leave you to vote your conscience... except in one category.

The Navy category has a plethora of excellent blogs, but Neptunus Lex is a standout. If you've read his stuff and liked it, please consider voting for him. Right now he's trailing by just a couple of votes.

You can see all the categories here.

Read More......

One Can Hope...

Sorry, no braincells available today for serious stuff...

But I found the following in my fortune cookies tonight (take-out place accidentally gave me two):

1. You will make a name for yourself.
2. Beautiful things await you.

Read More......

Britney and the Marines

[Update: Another Marine story... What do you get when you cross a Marine with a high-tech Japanese toilet? Major Bell has the answer.]

A very young Marine was talking to a fellow Marine in a calm, matter-of-fact manner as they waited behind me at the mini mart. His friend was obviously used to these kinds of ramblings and never made a sound in response:

Did you hear how Justin hurt Britney again--getting all friendly with K, talking 'bout her?

[pause]

That's so mean.

How could he do that to her when she's hurting so much... when she's all crazy and everything?

[long pause]

[with a touch of wonder in his voice] She shaved off all her hair...

[another long pause]

[somewhat sadly] Now she looks like me. *sigh*

I'm so glad they were standing behind me and couldn't see the hand that flew to my mouth as I stifled an involuntary snort of laughter!! Gotta love those young Marines...

Read More......

25 February, 2007

Monday Fluff

[If you're looking for serious content, scroll down. If you want something diverting, this is your post. ;) ]

Raven of And Rightly So has a little game I thought might liven things up around here. We've been entirely too serious lately! Here's how it goes, according to Raven:

A. First, recommend to me (in comments below):
1. A movie:
2. A book:
3. A musical artist, song, or album:

B. Then, ask me three questions--no more, no less. Ask anything you want.

C. Finally, go to your blog and post a copy of this, and answer the questions asked of you.

As she points out, this a good way for us to get to know a little bit more about each other. So, recommend, and ask away!

Read More......

Japanese Ambassador Honors Wounded Veterans

Click photo for screen-resolution image
U.S. Army Pfc. Marissa Strock , left, a double-leg amputee wounded in Iraq, and her mother, Sandi Ogden, follow Japanese Lt. Col. Ichiro Sato's instructions as they fold origami paper into cranes during an evening at Ambassador Ryozo Kato's residence Feb. 23 in Washington, D.C. Defense Dept. photo by John J. Kruzel.

The article doesn't mention it, but I believe this was one of the rotating dinners for the wounded that have continued despite the demise of Fran O'Brien's. This week the Japanese Ambassador hosted the dinner in the finest tradition of Japanese hospitality and grace.
In Japan, people make origami paper cranes for the sick and injured as a prayer for their recovery. A group of 70 wounded U.S. veterans and their family members found such cranes waiting for them on their dinner tables last night, when they attended a dinner in their honor at the residence of Japanese Ambassador Ryozo Kato. [snip]

“The grateful people of Japan wish each of you health and success in the years ahead, just as we wish for the nation you serve,” Kato said, quoting [Japanese Ambassador Prime Minister] Abe.

Before dinner began, Kato ended by telling troops that although the two cultures differ, U.S. servicemembers represent Japan’s “samurai spirit.” “Samurais serve with valor, with honor, with loyalty, with respectful, ethical behavior,” he said. “And so have you.”

There was much more to the event--including baseball!--and it sounds like the Japanese really outdid themselves in providing a warm and welcoming event for the wounded. Read it all, and be reminded again of what special friends our former enemies have become.

UPDATE: If the name "Marissa Strock" (in the picture above) sounds familiar to you, it should. She's the woman who walked on her prosthetic legs into Jim Mayer's arms at the last Fran O'Brien's dinner. You can find more about her through a Google search. A recent article reports that she is rock-climbing.

[H/T Gazing at the Flag, who is up for a MilBloggie and would certainly be a deserving winner.]

Read More......

Troop Support through Entrepreneurial Leadership?

The entrepreneur is our visionary, the creator in each of us. We're born with that quality and it defines our lives as we respond to what we see, hear, feel, and experience. It is developed, nurtured, and given space to flourish or is squelched, thwarted, without air or stimulation, and dies. - Michael Gerber

In a post last week, Andi gathered a list of people involved in grassroots troop support activities of significant impact. I was surprised and honored to see Andi group me with people like Marty Horn, Patti Bader and Jim Mayer (and all the other wonderful people in that list), but it was a commenter who really got my attention.

I don't know what his involvement is in any of the programs Andi linked, but Bob "gets it." Regarding the people on Andi's list, he made two huge points that I've tried (and failed) to articulate before:

One reason why their work is so important is that they make it possible for the millions of kind-hearted Americans who are willing to help (but don't know how) to make a difference in the lives of our military and their families.

Exactly! Valour-IT taught me that there is a massive desire to help among people with no direct military connections; just give them a simple and intuitively-understood way to help and they will drown you in donations and offers of assistance. The challenge is not finding Americans who care about the troops. Rather, it's informing those millions of caring Americans about the ways to help.

Those of us who got involved in military support projects at the ground level discovered things quickly developed a life of their own due to the other people who became involved with our efforts. AnySoldier is now far, far bigger than anything Marty Horn ever imagined when he set up a site for friends and family who wanted to send care packages in the early days of the Iraq war. Patti Bader had a similar experience, but ended up in at a different place (still doing care packages, but increasingly focused on supporting families and the wounded).

The genius of what they do isn't to do it all, but to make it possible for others to do what they can. They are the classic examples of entrepreneurial leadership: making lives better, not making money....

Yes!!! This is why I so often brush aside kudos sent my way. Chuck and I didn't do it all, we merely saw a need, then imagined and set the foundation for a system that allowed others to fill that need. From milbloggers to donors, to those who offered their media connections, mentoring, and professional expertise/skills, other people stepped up to make it happen.

Now that job description is one I won't fight: Entrepreneurial Leader. And as we all know, leaders don't actually do anything, anyway... ;)

ADDENDUM: Andi is far too modest, but she belongs right up there on that list. Her leadership in the creation of the MilBlog conferences is having ripple effects of such number and magnitude that it will likely take many years to fully understand her impact.

Read More......

24 February, 2007

They Also Serve...

...who only stand and wait. Two stories that reminded me of that today.

The separation:

Today I got a text message from Joel during class. The four words somehow caught in my throat. I had to leave the room. I’m continually trying to maintain my military bearing. The second week of Army Chaplain Officer Basic Course my goal was to survive the ruck marches. The third week it was to complete every challenge in the field and on the obstacle course. The fourth week it was to not be hospitalized for some serious liver problem… This week my goal is to not cry in class. So classmates of mine… pretend you didn’t read this and just act like you believe me when I smile and say I’m doing great.

Yes my husband is going to war for a year. Yes it stinks. But hey we’re in the Army and this is what we do. This is what we signed up for… this is who we are…

Are you buying any of that? Because I’m not. Not tonight anyway.

The fear:

Our meeting came and went and still nothing. I dawdled around at church as long as I could but eventually I had to go home. I drove slowly. I finally called a girlfriend and made her check the headlines to see if there had been any kind of helicopter crash that I hadn't heard about. I didn't want to turn down my street and see some kind of "official-looking car" sitting parked outside my house. I didn't want to pee on the seat if that were the case.

[H/T to Barb for the first link above]

Read More......

Milbloggie Friends

There are a number of excellent blogs competing for a 2007 Milbloggie. I encourage you to check the nominees in all the categories, but I thought I'd highlight some of my favorites:

It's not surprising that most of these are among the top-three vote-getters in their category...

Army: No mistake that these three are the leaders in their category
Acute Politics: "New" guy who reminds many people of the greatest of the deployed milbloggers.
From My Position: Rants and stories from a wounded soldier who will always be a tanker at heart.
Badgers Forward: Milblogger serving with Acute Politics, whose writing is nearly his equal.

Air Force:
Mudville Gazette: You can't call yourself a milblog reader if Papa Greyhawk isn't bookmarked in your browser.

Navy: Every entrant in this category is excellent, but Neptunus Lex is in a class of his own. Whether sea stories, political/social/military analysis or lighter fare, Lex's masterful writing and delicious wit is unbeatable. Yeah, I'm biased. :)

Marine Corps:
One Marine's View: Marine-related news, along with Major Pain's unique style and stories. He's stateside now, but he hasn't forgotten his wounded/deployed brothers.
Sand Gram: Amazing and hilarious stories from a reserve Marine and commercial pilot.

Military Veteran: Blackfive and Michael Yon should be on your regular reads.

Civilians:
Soldiers' Angels Germany: Superb, informative blog covering our military at work and the efforts of Soldiers' Angels in Germany that probably more rightly belongs in the Military Support category.
Iraq War Today: Supporting the troops and highlighting stories about the military in action that don't make the headlines.
Semper Gratus: Troop Support from the activist perspective.

Military Spouse:
Andi's World: Politics, military life and troop support activities from the force behind the Milblog Conferences.
Army Wife Toddler Mom: Where spouse blogs and mommy blogs intersect with humor and whimsical writing.
SpouseBUZZ: The place for military spouses and those who care about them.

Military Parent: The only one I read in this category is Some Soldiers' Mom, but she's certainly deserving of a win.

Military Support: That's my category and there are some great blogs here. Check 'em out!

Read More......

20 February, 2007

Walter Reed, Bureaucracy and Military Medical Care

UPDATE: Chuck has an absolute must-read on this. Seriously, don't miss it. John and Andi also make some great points.

This is practically old news by blog standards, but I didn't have time to sit down and write anything intelligent about it until now. But first, a couple of clarifications: the second WaPo article (about Mologne House) was a breathless, vile and agenda-driven piece of **** ; the first WaPo article (about Building 18, an outpatient residential facility) was also breathless and agenda-driven but largely accurate in the issues it raised about the problems at Building 18 and the broken bureaucracy of med boards and treatment/housing for the wounded after their initial hospitalization. It's that first article I'm addressing here.

The only thing in the first article that was new to those of us "plugged in" to the wounded and related issues was the physical condition of Building 18. The rest of it has been a sad reality for years (we've all heard/have horror stories), and is a great deal of what has motivated our involvement in volunteer and non-profit activities that do more than just "support" the wounded and their familes with words (the post-hospital care and the "boards" issues are a disgrace, but can only be fixed largely through governmental action--something that moves with grinding slowness, unlike the nonprofit/volunteer sector).

The standard recommendation from honest medical personnel in even the best civilian hospital is that no one should stay in a hospital unaccompanied by a smart and self-possessed loved one to stay on top of the patient's treatment. There are too many opportunities for error or indifference through understaffing/stupidity/exhaustion, and a loved one knows and cares for the patient far more than any doctor or nurse ever will. That bit of advice goes at least double for anyone suffering the tender mercies of a standard government bureaucracy cloaked in medical garb. That doesn't excuse the situation, but it's a statement of the reality that must be dealt with today (hopefully we can make tomorrow better).

So, why did it take the Washington Post (and other outlets these last few days) for these issues to get the attention needed? Three big reasons:

1. Though some of the issues have been addressed in the last six months or so, nothing motivates a lethargic bureaucracy like self-preservation. In this case, those responsible at WR suddenly had everyone from the President to the most-junior congressman breathing down their necks.

2. Many veterans who have experience with the military bureaucracy don't believe it ever can or will be fundamentally changed (read the comments in that link, too).

3. Those of us wanting to help the wounded knew the conditions from contacts/experience and decided we could be more effective by just going around the government behemoth rather than engaging it.

The rest I don't have time to write what (or the way) I want to, so you get it in bullet points:

  • The WaPo didn't write this story because they cared about anything like truth, justice, or what our troops deserve. I have multiple first and second-hand sources who tell me they have long been hitting up military families (both in and out of the services) to tell their stories for just such a series as they have been doing. Contrast their manipulative and breathless prose with Army Times' excellent in-depth reporting on the problem.
  • As has been pointed out elsewhere, the fact that the WaPo pursued this story for so long without ever engaging the people responsible for the conditions tells us that the the suffering and burden on the wounded was not what drove them. If it were, they wouldn't have waited 'til now to go public; rather, they would've confronted those in charge with the problems and made that their story. In short, the wounded veterans are being used as pawns in a political/media war.
  • More than money or politics, this is fundamentally a failure of leadership at the mid and lower levels.
  • For more on this story, read the excellent writings of Andi (here, too), John and Smash [as with all the milblog links above, the comments are worth a read].
  • What can you do to help? This is a case where grassroots political action is necessary (I prefer non-political, non-profit work because I seem to have a knack for it. Anybody up to working the political side?). If you want to fundamentally change the system, it takes engaging the lawmakers... who then hopefully exert the necessary pressure on the bureaucrats. It takes years, and I don't have that kind of patience. But I will gladly follow someone who does.

Read More......

19 February, 2007

Milbloggies Bleg

Just a reminder...

Please help nominate me for a Milbloggie! Fuzzilicious Thinking must end up in the top five to get into the finals.

If you need to register at Milblogging.com in order to nominate me, start here, You can follow the voting here (I'm in the U.S. Military Supporter category, but hanging on to the top five by my fingernails).

Read More......

Welcome Home

As I've mentioned, Chuck Ziegenfuss was scheduled for his 34th surgery last week. All went well at the hospital, but he came home to a driveway full of snow. And not surprisingly to those who know him, he insisted on trying to clear it despite his condition...

After spending an hour trying to operate a snow shovel with one hand (and not being able to bend/lift, because of the graft donor site on my right-side tummy) and watching car after car drive by, with people actually gawking and waving, (our house is on a busy street, and probably 100 or so cars went by in that hour) but no one stopping to so much as ask if we needed help, I was pretty down on the population of Indiana, PA, and mankind in general.

Then someone got my truck stuck in the driveway. Out-damned-standing.

While trying to keep my cool, and trying to un-stuck the truck, and trying (somewhat unsuccessfully) to keep the Mrs. from taking a swing at me...

Go see what happened next. Personally, I'd have been cheering Carren on. Men! ;)

Update: Carren's version of the story.

Read More......

Problems at WR: THe Real Story

Here's an article about some of the bureaucratic issues for wounded outpatients at Walter Reed. Unlike the WaPo, the Army Times cuts out the sensationalism and spin:

In 2001, 10 percent of soldiers going through the medical retirement process received permanent disability benefits. In 2005, with two wars raging, that percentage dropped to 3 percent, according to the Government Accountability Office. Reservists dropped from 16 percent to 5 percent.

Soldiers go to VA to try for more benefits, but the department had a staggering 400,000-case backup on new claims in fiscal 2006, according to VA.

******

Since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan began, the number of soldiers wading through the paperwork, physicals and appointments has doubled at Walter Reed. According to a Defense Department directive, it should take a total of 120 days from start to finish, but the average stay for Walter Reed soldiers is 270 days. The soldiers navigate a complicated system with the help of counselors with little more experience — or rank — than they have, and who lack training, according to a March 2006 Government Accountability Office report.

If you really want to understand the travesty of what happens in the out-patient and med boards process at WR, and why, this is a must-read.

Read More......

The Wounded are "Combat-Addled" Druggies

That title offend you much? Well, that's how the Washington Post paints wounded American warfighters (yes, "combat-addled"). Yesterday they published a story about a run-down facility off the Walter Reed grounds ["Building 18"] that houses some of the outpatients. I have some thoughts about what can be done to help, but that's a separate post.

What has me seething today is the WaPo followup. This time they cover Mologne House:

Mologne House is afloat on a river of painkillers and antipsychotic drugs...

Pill bottles clutter the nightstands: pills for depression or insomnia, to stop nightmares and pain, to calm the nerves.

Here at Hotel Aftermath, a crash of dishes in the cafeteria can induce seizures in the combat-addled. Even among the gazebos and tranquility of the Walter Reed campus in upper Northwest Washington, manhole covers are sidestepped for fear of bombs and rooftops are scanned for snipers.

Bomb blasts are the most common cause of injury in Iraq, and nearly 60 percent of the blast victims also suffer from traumatic brain injury, according to Walter Reed's studies, which explains why some at Mologne House wander the hallways trying to remember their room numbers.

It goes on to outline some heart-breaking stories of people whose mental capacities have been affected by their injury or emotional trauma, and details the absurdity of the military bureaucracy and disability ratings.

It even covers people like Brian Anderson. But here's the interesting part, Brian has a paper trail--one in which he is positive, upbeat, and inspirational. So they can't really have him say too much. Instead they frame him as the recipient of unfair generosity and describe how the ceremonial cannon salutes at Arlington (quite reasonably) freak him out.

And that's the proof of the agenda. This article was not written to show the cross-section of survivors and their challenges. No, it was not written to analyze and dissect the bureaucratic inadequacies of post-injury care or the med boards. This was a pathetic piece of propaganda about how all the wounded are to be pitied and how they'll never be able to function in society, and how nobody really cares. The anti-war whisper throughout is almost a shout...

And you want to talk about manipulation of a story by what is not reported? Try this on for size... They mention Code Pink outside the gates, but not the counter-protesters. And Valour-IT gets a mention, though not by name; instead, having to practice the voice software is painted as a burden on the poor addled soldier.

My God! I KNOW people who've been wounded, who lived in Mologne house, who coped (are still coping) with PTSD, who have had more surgeries than I can keep track of, who went through the hell of GETTING OFF OF the painkillers that turned them into zombies, who are slowly but inexorably finding their new and productive place in the world and who are putting their lives back together!

There are thousands of us working behind the scenes to address the points where the military bureaucracy has dropped the ball or sets up roadblocks; we're aware of the monumental and de-humanizing problems. But we do not pity the wounded, we do not see their condition as static, we do not look on the hospital as a "holding pen" or their final destination. We find the idea of a hotel bar in Malogne House with a "bowl of red apples" on the desk and a Toby Keith concert all interspersed with disfiguring injuries and their emotional aftermath to be standard, to be a sign that life is returning, that all will not end in this place of confusion and pain.

But no, that view is too hopeful, too respectful of the wounded and their capabilities, too "worshipful" of those who have given so much. Better that we pity and emasculate them...

UPDATE: For a truly informative article on the bureaucratic challenges the outpatients face, read today's Army Times article on the subject.

UPDATE II: "Tom the Redhunter" adds his on-the-scene observations in comments below. Well worth reading for those who may not have personal experience in this area.

UPDATE III: My thoughts on the Building 18 story.

UPDATE IV: Welcome, Michelle Malkin readers! If you are interested in how you can help patients at Walter Reed immediately (without waiting for the bureaucracy to fix itself), please consider volunteering with or donating to Soldiers' Angels or Project Valour-IT.]

Read More......

17 February, 2007

Two of My Favorite Things


...Padres and Marines.

The Padres announced Tuesday that they have agreed to terms on a Minor League contract with Brannan, a 22-year-old right-hander who as a Marine corporal was wounded in Iraq but came back to the U.S. to find his dream of playing baseball was still very much alive.

"I never figured when I was in Iraq that I'd be given this opportunty again, coming back from there," Brannan said Tuesday morning.

Brannan was an infantry squad leader during his second tour and suffered serious grenade damage to his left hand, but he says it hasn't affected his ability to pitch and field the ball.

Wearing his new Padres camouflage jersey over his military fatigues, Marine Cpl. Nels Cooper Brannan stood at a podium Tuesday morning, overwhelmed by emotion.

Before paying gratitude to the Padres executives responsible for the improbable news conference at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Brannan tried to salute his fallen comrades ---- soldiers, like him, who fought bravely for their country in the war in Iraq. He faltered. The words became lodged in his throat.

"They say Marines don't cry, right?" Brannan said, his soft tone belying his strapping 6-foot-4, 235-pound frame.

Brannan was a star for the Marine Baseball Team, but was so modest a friend had to chat up the Padres CEO about him.

The Padres, both organizationally and individually, are tremendous supporters of the many Sailors and Marines stationed in the San Diego area. Their CEO is a former Marine (Vietnam veteran) and their longtime senior broadcaster was a Marine colonel who served as a pilot in WWII and Korea. The team regularly holds special events for military families, and the playing of the Navy Hymn and the Marines' Hymn for attending Navy and USMC contingents is a highlight of each Sunday home game.

Much more here and here, along with video and a great radio interview here.

Read More......

Congressman Johnson's Floor Speech

This is video of the speech I referenced yesterday. It starts a touch slow with biographical information (it's clear from his delivery that a staffer/speechwriter urged him to spend that much time talking about himself and he'd rather not), but it just gets better and better as it goes. Be sure you're watching and not just listening during the last 30 seconds or so.

[H/T AWTM]

Read More......

The Milbloggies are Here!

Well, I finally went and did it... joined the big leagues. Yesterday I signed this blog up at Milblogging.com. I admit it: I'm hoping for a Milbloggies nomination. I'm in a small category, so I think I have a chance.

I have long blogged for very personal reasons and said I don't do it to compete with anyone for number of "hits" or level of attention from the bigwigs. And that's absolutely true. But of course I enjoy it when I happen to get it (got a lot, recently!), and I thought it might be fun to see how far I can go with the Milbloggies.

Please click here to nominate me for "Best Military Support Blog" (you can nominate as many blogs in this category as you want). The more nominations I get, the better my chances of getting into the Finals.

But hurry! I got a late start and nominations are only open until February 22!

Read More......

On Coming Home

Pixie's Other Half is back from the war. It's not as simple as it sounds...

I felt the fibers that held us together stretch and break as I got into my car and drove away, never looking ahead, only into my rear-view mirror as he stood on the curb and waved good-bye. Hand raised, motionless until he disappeared from my view. I remember the days that followed were filled with anxiety and physical illness. Somehow inside of me there was a part that knew what followed was going to take everything I had and then some new parts of me that I didn't just yet recognize or know I was capable of incorporating into... me... him... us... we.

And now he's coming home. I love him. I love him as deeply as I ever loved him. The moment I met him I knew we would have a long history together. I wonder... has he healed of me? Has my internal, constant, looping "pep-talk" to be strong, stronger, stronger, heal and grow made me incapable of having a normal relationship with him? Do we even still like one another despite the love?

...Which is perfectly normal for those who have a loved one in the fight. The servicemember isn't the only one who sacrifices...

Read More......

Link Dump

There's a lot of good stuff out there that I don't have time to present properly, but wanted to share...

New(ish) naval aviator blog: Southern Air Pirate's Haze Gray Thoughts

Doorkeeper, commenting at Lex's, had a great Valentine's Day story:

13 years ago, I took the older two kids (3 and 1) to the babysitter, made a nice steak dinner with dessert and all…met him at the door in my black miniskirt and frilly white blouse…..he got me nothing for VDay, at least that’s what we thought…
two weeks later, I was sick every morning… and he’s BOUGHT a gift ever since!!!

President's thoughts on media coverage of Iraq? He punted.

Keith Olbermann hits the bigtime.

Murtha's "slow bleed" plan is not only immoral, it's probably unconstitutional, too.

Great video

And finally, some excellent blogs I hope you're reading: Calm Before the Sand, Acute Politics, The Middle Ground.

Read More......

16 February, 2007

Inside Politics

If that last post was too depressing for you, here is someone who has a more optimistic take on politics and John Murtha's intentions.

"Ghost of Habu the Pit Viper" is a frequent commenter at Blackfive. From his comments, and his "nom de blog" in relation to some of Uncle Jimbo's Special Forces stories, I'd wager a great deal of money that "Ghost" is a former SF teammate of Uncle J's who is now deeply involved in Washington congressional politics (perhaps as a lobbyist or staffer?).

Here's what he said in comments a couple days ago about the possible effectiveness of Murtha's "slow bleed" plan to stop the Iraq war:

You can pull this in the House, but not the Senate. These types of stupid ideas tend to die out fairly quickly, because you're hitting way too close to home with too many other members of both the House and the Senate.

As an example - let's say Johnny Boy decides to cut back in funding of the military in specific areas which he thinks will limit down the deployment of forces by this President.

Well, the advent of those infamous congressional "earmarks" means that each time he pulls this stunt, he's pissing on somebody else's parade. Before long, NOTHING gets done because working relationships all over the place are being shattered. And once those relationships go "bye bye" due to this type of a money/budget issue, it's pretty close to all-out open warfare. Believe me, won't take long at all for that situation to develop. And there will be some really interesting political partnerships formed up (you will not believe...).

Actual truth of the matter is, that if I wanted to get rid of congressional earmarks 100% now & in the future, this would be just the way to accomplish it. Anybody who thinks this open budget warfare would just stay in the national defense side of the arena is just flat out crazy - it will spread accross the entire budget in no time.

And if you know the history, you know that Johnny Boy is more addicted to congressional earmarks than most. The PA congressional delegation meetings will turn out to be really interesting if "John Boy" Murtha pulls this type of stunt (just once will be all it takes).

Everybody remembers Tip's old dictum:"All politics is Local". But there's a little known corollary to that one, which is "Don't let national politics control your local politics".

Murtha will come quickly to understand the latter part.

And just today he wrote the following in response to the fury many are feeling about the House's vote:

But the House resolution's meaningless. The resolution that passed the House won't even get close in the Senate.

I guess my whole point is that let's save our outrage for when it's really useful, because otherwise we're going to be serving up a steady & constant diet of "Outrage" any time the US House does literally anything. The House is going to be doing this type of thing alot, just not getting much accomplished in the end. Save our outrage for when it counts, this isn't one of those times. [snip]

If Mike Yon and others like him who are over in Iraq are right and General Petraeus and his team pull this one off, does that mean that the congressional Democrats are guilty of using and relying on incorrect intel? (or maybe ignoring alternate points of view and conflicting information)

(Political) Lesson Learned: You never make your political allies vote on a truely contentious issue, when the outcome is totally out of your control. Can end up making your allies look bad, and your decision making suspect.

And more on Murtha's plans:

First off, this isn't the way John Murtha normally operates. He's not normally big into flouting these types of actions in advance, because that gives opponents more opportunity to devise ways to make his life miserable. He's more of a "shiv in the back in the middle of the night" type of guy.

There's actually several schools of though going around on what he's really trying to accomplish.

1. Democrats can pretty much do as they please in the House. Senate's a totally different story. Some folks feel Murtha's trying to build leverage in the House's eventual dealings with the Senate. Conference committee's will be coming a callin.
2. House Democrats had their first "100 hours" burst, but now it's "What have you done for me lately?" And the answer is, "It's out of their hands, and it's not looking good". They get their work does ASAP, and then get to sit and watch while everything they promised and dreamed about either dies, gets changed, and there's basically nothing they can do about it. Impotence is not what these folks are into, but that's the game they get to deal with - Want to elbow their way back into the game.
3. He's trying to buy time for Nancy and the rest of team with the far left. The very last thing the Democrats need is for their own civil war to break out, going into a presidential primary season to boot. Those folks get too crazy, and the Democratis party's chances in 2008 are in trouble. 1968 was a very ugly year for the Democrats.

Food for (happier) thoughts...

Read More......

These Speak for Me

An overwhelming abundance of thoughts and emotions about the despicable actions of our Congress today swirl in my head, and I cannot find the beginning or end that will enable me to start to express them. But here is what a man--Rep. Sam Johnson--who was held in the Hanoi Hilton (and still suffers the physical damages of his confinement) said today on the floor of the House:

And my fellow POWs and I clung to the hope of when - not if - we returned home. [snip]

We pledged to quit griping about the way the government was running the war in Vietnam and do something about it... We decided that we would run for office and try to make America a better place for all. [snip]

Debating non-binding resolutions aimed at earning political points only destroys morale, stymies success, and emboldens the enemy.

The grim reality is that this House measure is the first step to cutting funding of the troops…Just ask John Murtha about his ’slow-bleed’ plan that hamstrings our troops in harm’s way.

Now it’s time to stand up for my friends who did not make it home, and those who fought and died in Iraq, so I can keep my promise that when we got home we would quit griping about the war and do something positive about it…and we must not allow this Congress to leave these troops like the Congress left us.


Today, let my body serve as a brutal reminder that we must not repeat the mistakes of the past…instead learn from them.

We must not cut funding for our troops. We must stick by them. We must support them all the way…To our troops we must remain…always faithful.

Read the whole speech (or view it here), then read what a warrior nearing deployment wrote today:
The damage is incalculable, and now officially done.

He closes with a quote from Joe Lieberman:
Cynics may say this kind of thing happens all of the time in Congress. In this case, however, they are wrong. If it passed, this resolution would be unique in American legislative history. I contacted the Library of Congress on this question last week and was told that, never before, when American soldiers have been in harm’s way, fighting and dying in a conflict that Congress had voted to authorize, has Congress turned around and passed a resolution like this, disapproving of a particular battlefield strategy.

And worst (or best) of all... the "surge" (which is more about tactics than numbers, btw) that they are refusing to support is... working.

The tears are close as I write this. We are letting down the very people who lay their lives on the line for us. I am ashamed of this country's electorate, ashamed of our "leaders," and very afraid for the future.

And I am furious.

I have never donated to a political campaign in my life. I will now. For whom, you ask? For anyone running against the @&$#s who voted for the resolution--Democrat, Republican, or anything else.

Read More......

14 February, 2007

True Love... After Decades Apart

Okay, to make up for the nasty post below, here's an absolutely beautiful Valentine's Day love story. And it involves a milblogger!

“She e-mailed me and said ‘Oh my God! Just so you know, when you come down on the weekend, Bill Paisley might be here!’ She wondered if I would have a problem with that, but I said I thought I was finally ready to face the bastard,” Zwicker said.

Pics and background here.

Congratulations, Pinch! Gives the rest of us old maids some hope... ;)

Read More......

VD

For all your Anti-Valentine's-day needs...

You'd think having a boyfriend this year on Valentine's (extremely rare) and having never been completely enamored of Valentine's Day would make these inapplicable to me. Nope.

Seriously, hope you have a great day and that someone you love takes the opportunity to remind you you're loved--even if it doesn't involve candy, flower, a restaurant or any other cliches!

Read More......

12 February, 2007

Like parent, like child?

My job involves working with children of military personnel. Of course, the "type" of person who signs up for military service does it for a variety of reasons. But today I couldn't help think the apples didn't fall far from the trees I have known...

Four 5-and-6-year-old boys were playing with the giant, interlocking plastic tiles. They had created very-impressive plane-like structures, which some boys were obviously riding. Others were carefully placing large numbers of dinosaur figures into enclosed portions of the structures. I asked what they were doing, and received the following community reply as several boys pitched in to flesh out the story for me:

"We're putting the little dinosaurs in the spaceships because the big dinosaurs were killing them."

Another kid piped up, "Yeah, the big dinosaurs were bad. They kept trying to attack the other dinosaurs. So we attacked them!"

"Where are the little dinosaurs going?" I couldn't help but ask.

"They're hurt. So we're taking them from Uranus--that's where they used to live--and taking them with us to the hospital so that they can get well."

I expressed my approval of the humanitarian instinct present in their plan.

Another voice piped up, "When they get well, we'll take them back to Uranus and make sure there aren't any more bad dinosaurs there. If there are, we'll get rid of them."

I couldn't help but smile. Apparently it starts young; they've already got that justice-oriented, protective instinct common to the best of our fighting men and women. I have to admit, my heart felt a bit of a tug...

Read More......

09 February, 2007

WaPo Says "Oops!!"

Apparently the AP isn't the only one who has botched the story of the IG's report. The Washington Post has major egg on its face today. We're talking "crawl under the desk" and "wake me when it's over" kinds of egg.

As Hot Air says,

They’re calling it a “correction,” but is it really a correction if you’re quoting from an entirely different document than the one you thought you were? And your story kinda sorta hinges on which one it was?

....Got that? The big scoop was that the Pentagon itself had concluded that Feith floated bogus intel on the links between Iraq and AQ and suggested that he’d done so at Bush/Cheney’s behest. Except the Pentagon didn’t conclude that. Anti-war Democrat Carl Levin did.

Wow.

UPDATE: Sensible Mom has a... well... sensible point:
Most shocking is the obvious fact that the reporter and editor never read the IG's report. If they had, they would have realized the quotes were wrong. Do they proofread their work or is the rush to judgment more important?

Ace of Spades makes another good point:
"Confirmation bias," they call it-- the press simply will run anti-Republican stories that ought to sound a little implausible or sketchy because, to them, they sound pretty darn reasonable. Such "facts" are "self-checking" -- they just prove themselves by how wonderfully they fit in with the liberal worldview.

Read More......

Saturday Diversion

The great Sviatoslav Richter...



That's Chopin's Etude Op. 10 No. 4. No, I was never that good a pianist. But it's not really hard to play something like that for short bursts; it's the focus and consistency required to maintain that level of performance for more than a few seconds that is hard! ;)

Like many things, at the upper levels it's all in the mind. And now you know why I'm not a concert performer... ;)

For more musicality with your technical fire works, try this beautiful performance where he balances the themes in the left hand in Chopin's so-called "Winter Wind" etude.

Read More......

More Media Madness?

[UPDATE VI: Michelle Malkin links with a roundup on the story and a delicious zinger: "Perhaps newspapers should start running disclaimers that they assume no responsibility for the accuracy of AP's information." She starts her post off with an absolutely ghastly error by the WaPo in its front-page article on the IG's report. Amazing, but give the WaPo credit for prominent correction. More here.
UPDATE V: Flopping Aces has detailed background on the story
UPDATE IV: Welcome, Hugh Hewitt and Powerline readers. I have complete screenshots of each version of the article mentioned, but no way to easily post them. I can email them to anyone, though.
UPDATE III: The story/link has been completely overhauled. More info below
UPDATE II: The executive summary (warning: PDF file) of the report in question
UPDATE: Uncle J dismantles the revised version of the article.]


I don't know how to explain the following, but here it is...

As reported by Powerline yesterday, the AP published a story by Robert Burns with the odd headline "Pentagon Says Pre-War Intel Not Illegal."

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Some of the Pentagon's prewar intelligence work, including a contention that the CIA underplayed the likelihood of al-Qaida connections to Saddam Hussein, was inappropriate but not illegal, a Defense Department investigation has concluded.

In a report to be presented to Congress on Friday, the department's inspector general said former Pentagon policy chief Douglas J. Feith had not engaged in illegal activities through the creation of special offices to review intelligence. Some Democrats also have contended that Feith misled Congress about the basis of the administration's assertions on the threat posed by Iraq, but the Pentagon investigation did not support that. [This statement is key.]

...The Senate Armed Services Committee has scheduled a hearing Friday to receive the findings by Thomas F. Gimble, the Pentagon's acting inspector general. The committee's chairman, Carl Levin, D-Mich., has been a leading critic of Feith's role in prewar intelligence activities and has accused him of deceiving Congress.

Powerline describes it as the resolution of an example of internecine bureaucratic warfare, a fight over who gets to interpret CIA intelligence.

Thirty-seven minutes ago this morning, the AP put up a re-arranged version of this same story [re-written at 1:52 Eastern, but I have a screenshot and here's the "original "revised version Uncle J linked] by the same writer. New headline--"Report says Pentagon manipulated intel." And the entire story has been turned on its head:


WASHINGTON - A "very damning" report by the Defense Department's inspector general depicts a Pentagon that purposely manipulated intelligence in an effort to link Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida in the runup to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, says the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"That was the argument that was used to make the sale to the American people about the need to go to war," said Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich. He said the Pentagon's work, "which was wrong, which was distorted, which was inappropriate ... is something which is highly disturbing."

The investigation by acting inspector general Thomas F. Gimble found that prewar intelligence work at the Pentagon, including a contention that the CIA had underplayed the likelihood of an al-Qaida connection, was inappropriate but not illegal. The report was to be presented to Levin's panel at a hearing Friday.

The first bolded statement above no longer appears in the report [UPDATE: don't know how I missed it, but it is there].

If anybody can show me how those two bolded statements can be reconciled, I'd love to hear it. And an explanation of what happened between 6:51 last night and 5:45 this morning might be helpful, too [I have screen shots of the entirety of both articles in case they change].

***************

UPDATE III: In a version first published at/around 1:52 p.m. Eastern [I'm capturing it in screenshots], the story from the second version linked above appears to have been completely re-written (still the same author). The opening paragraphs and the tenor of the article are much more accurate this time:


WASHINGTON - Pentagon officials undercut the intelligence community in the run-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq by insisting in briefings to the White House that there was a clear relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, the Defense Department's inspector general said Friday.

Acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the office headed by former Pentagon policy chief Douglas J. Feith took inappropriate" actions in advancing conclusions on al-Qaida connections not backed up by the nation's intelligence agencies.

Gimble said that while the actions of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy "were not illegal or unauthorized," they "did not provide the most accurate analysis of intelligence to senior decision makers" at a time when the White House was moving toward war with Iraq.

It goes on to in-depth coverage of the issue, with statements and opinions from all sides. It's actually excellent and informative reading. Considering how many times the story has been rewritten, we'll see how long this version lasts...

And an additional thought: What does this kind of on-the-fly revision without each subsequent version referencing the previous ones say about "journalistic integrity?" Big-name bloggers who constantly erased, revised and changed a single post in ways that changed the meaning of the post without noting the changes would be quickly unmasked and taken to task for it. Yet this is okay for Robert Burns of the vaunted Associated press? And bloggers are the ones who are "unprofessional??" [UPDATE: Powerline also discusses the journalistic implications]

Read More......

07 February, 2007

Surgery... Again.

Chuck Ziegenfuss (the inspiration for Valour-IT) is facing his 34th surgery next week. It's hard to imagine that many surgeries on one person.

It's been about 18 months since his hands were severely damaged by an IED and he's been long back on the job, but he's still hip-deep in reconstruction and recovery. This latest surgery (and the one set to follow) are of the reconstructive type, which means more pain and a temporary set-back in functionality of his hand, with subsequent hard work in Occupational Therapy (OT) to get it back:

OT is hard. OT hurts. OT is vitally necessary to build hand strength and flexibility. When I say it hurts, it isn't just the 90 minutes of pain inflicted on me at the OT clinic. I hurt for the next day or so, until I have another appointment, and we inflict more pain.

I used to eat fentanyl [painkiller] lollipops during OT, but my days of heavy narcotics are (thankfully) passed...I guess one of my biggest worries is taking truckloads of meds for the pain, and then having to titrate off of them again. Titration blows goat. However, I have done it several times...

It sounds like he's starting to psyche himself up for the battle ahead. Why don't you drop by his place and let him know you've got his back through it all?

Read More......

06 February, 2007

Arkin Finally Gets Reined In

[UPDATE: Bob Krumm has a nice background and roundup of responses with some classic quotes (scroll down).

UPDATE II: Arkin's obnoxious comments about the military are nothing new from him. Check out this old post,especially the last few paragraphs.]


I see Arkin's editors finally got through to him:

Note: On the advice of my editors, this is the last column I will post for awhile on this subject. My impulse would be to continue to fight back and answer the critics, but I see the wisdom in their observation that nothing new is being said here and the Internet frenzy is adding nothing to the debate or our understanding of our world. I also see that I cannot continue to write about humanity and difficult questions if indeed what I wish is to vanquish those who attack me.

I suppose the whole thing is worth a read, simply for what it reveals about Arkin's character. He's the victim, doncha you know...

I'd wager this latest from him means we've been heard, and that at least his editors (if not Arkin himself) realize there aren't many out there who agree with his opinion of America's military men and women. And for what that says about the majority of this country, it's heartening.

Let's hope this is the last time we find it necessary to speak of him.

Read More......

The Conference (and a Bleg)

Word of the 2007 MilBlog Conference has been slowly spreading, so I figure I should mention it...

If you are connected to the military blogging world in any way (blogger or reader), I strongly recommend it to you. Attending last year was an incredible experience--on personal, blogging, and professional levels. It changed me in significant ways, expanding my horizons and giving me and Valour-IT opportunities and connections that are still reverberating.

Yup, I'll be there! Thanks to some very dear people.

Someone out of the blue offered a plane ticket, and a local is opening her home [turns out her home is too far from the conference site in Arlington, but another friend offered to get me a hotel room]. I couldn't attend otherwise, having no reserves after being unemployed the last half of 2006. All I need now is general spending money (meals, the Metro, misc. travel expenses, etc.) and repair costs for my laptop screen--'cause what good is it for a blogger to attend a blogging conference without her laptop? It's just a loose connection, but labor is expensive...

I hesitated to ask for your assistance, but after seeing other respectable people step forward and ask, I'm swallowing my pride. Any support you could offer by hitting the anonymous tip jar on the right would be greatly appreciated (and I'll try to earn those tips by blogging more regularly).

Hope to see you there!

Read More......

03 February, 2007

The "6 Weird Things" Meme

A change of pace and topic around here...

AFSis tagged me: Post 6 weird things about yourself and tag 6 more bloggers. Leave a comment on their blogs to let them know they're tagged. As I warned AFSis, I am VERY weird. Believe, I left the weirdest stuff off this list!


1. I hate beer, wine, champagne, etc. In fact, the only intoxicating drink I've ever tried that I liked at all was mixed--a Cosmopolitan (cranberry, Grand Marnier and vodka with a lime). UPDATE: As Trias reminds me, Pina Coladas are good; I prefer them minus the alcohol, though.

2. I enjoyed reading professional nursing magazines... at age 10. Yes, ten years old.

3. Three weeks ago I backed my car into my mother's. Why is this weird? Her car was parked behind me in the carport at the time.

4. I love peanut butter... on celery, carrots, crackers, chocolate bars, banana or raisin sandwiches, pancakes, and human fingers.

5. I have never danced to music that wasn't at least 90 years old (never had the opportunity, really).

6. I'm a 30-something female who hated shopping until about six months ago. I now enjoy it sometimes, but it's still not even on my list of preferred activities to kill a few hours.

I'll post my list of tags later. I'm tagging: Sgt. B, Cassandra, Grim, Lex, Barb, and BillT... all of whom are definitely "characters" of the highest order. Which is just a nice way of saying they're weird, so this should be good! *grin*

Read More......

02 February, 2007

Update on a U.S.S. Frank Cable Sailor

This is an email I received recently [links added, names removed, published with permission]. I don't think any commentary is necessary...

First, let me say thank you to all of you in Soldiers' Angels. Your Group are really wonderful and great.

My name is [Mrs.] D and my husband Chief D. We have 2 kids [ages 14 and 12]. My husband and I are both from the Philippines and migrated here in the states some 20 years ago.

My husband was station in USS Frank Cable in Guam just a couple of months when the unfortunate accident happen in the ship. Him and other sailors (7) were involved in a steam burn due to one of the boiler exploded. They said he was a hero for he stayed to shut down the boiler before it can cause more life in the ship. That is why until now he is still in ICU burn unit here in Brooks Army Medical Center, Texas. They were transported here from Guam last December 1,2006 and till now he is still fighting to survived due to 75% bodily burn and extensive steam inhalation lung burn. He had about four skin graft surgery which I almost lost him and still more to come.

I know he is holding up because of our love for him, and for all the prayers we offer for him.

To all the members of Soldiers Angels that sent my husband well wishes and prayers I am very thankful and appreciate you all.

For all the goodies I receive and for the [Valour-IT] laptop that my husband got thank you.

And if ever I have forgotten to say thank you with others, I say thank you now.

God Bless You All,

Love,

Mrs D

From other sources I have learned that Chief D is by far the most seriously injured of those who have survived to this point. The lung damage is "very, very bad." In her reply when I asked if I could publish her note, Mrs D included the following revealing sentence: "I know that at this point I can use all the prayers and support from all of you."

If you would like to send Mrs. D an encouraging email, you can forward it to me and I will pass it on.

Read More......

A "Mercenary's" Wife and Kids


Homefront Six said the second goodbye yesterday:

Last night it was incredibly difficult to go to bed. I didn't want to. I knew that, if I went to bed, I would be sleeping away precious hours of being awake and knowing that he was here, safe, with us. That our house was a home. Until I went to bed, his departure date was still "tomorrow". And I knew that when I woke up, it would be the day that he had to leave. Climbing the stairs last night was almost harder than actually saying goodbye tonight.

Go read the rest, and let her know you're continuing to support them all.

Read More......

Musings

The Arkin-inspired brouhaha continues...

For me, the initial fury has subsided to the quieter sadness and fear. James Lileks about covers it when he writes that he read Arkin with a "heavy heart."

Others' responses have certainly been more hyperbolic.

But in those replies, the hyperbole itself tells us something: the anger and fury of those Arkin has maligned is real and deep. Arkin stood up and "said" what so many of these guys have heard among their local acquaintances and fear was expected ideology among a segment of the "elite." But now it's been said in a national media organ, by a member of the "intelligensia." The soldiers and veterans finally have a big and visible target for what they have wanted to say for so long.

I'm beginning to suspect that the anti-military values of the 60's generation never really went away; they just went underground for awhile. And when the Democrats won after having run on nothing, all the factions of the Party were free to fill in the blanks, and so the anti-troop wing read their pet ideas into the Democrats' win. Erroneously believing it was "anti-war" that powered the Dem win, they think they're now safe to spout their ignorance, hatred, and paucity of soul.

I think they may have overestimated the support they'll find, but
there are a few things that worry me: not enough Americans actually have regular interaction with today's military, interaction that would put the lie to the anti-military message they're going to increasingly receive; and far to many people are unquestioning receivers of the inaccuracy and bias that is now a vast majority of printed and electronic news media.

What to do? I don't know. Matt at Blackfive recently wrote a bit that was inspired by Uncle J's beatdown of Arkin. He laid things out in ways we usually don't see on the blog. He's not just speaking to the regulars; he's got the whole milblogosphere in mind, I think:

Hang on to your hats, Ladies. It's going to get A LOT rougher before it gets better. There's chatter from some bloggers willing to give up because it's too intense. Not us, we're in this fight for the men and women fighting for the rights of those POSs to spew their uber-tripe (besides, Jimbo has fun with this stuff - especially, when he's off his meds).

There's a lot that all of us here are working on. Details to follow.

Stay Strong.

For those who want to belittle milbloggers and their impact: he's not just talking about keyboard commandos sitting and writing on their blogs; that's not enough to counteract what we fear is the coming wave of soldier mistreatment. And to say "it's too intense" isn't some play on words as if this were a battlefield firefight. The "intensity" is because the hateful words heading their direction are real and they are painful. I know too many people whose hearts are heavy, for whom this isn't an intellectual exercise... people who believe the country is nearing a crossroads in terms of national security and patriotic values.

And don't underestimate the passion that will motivate the older veterans. I've seen it this last year as I've attended troop support events/activities. The tender and protective love of the Vietnam-era veterans toward their younger brothers is obvious in the most simple words and actions up through things like the Patriot Guard Riders; the fire runs soul-deep and the commitment is unshakable. When they say "never again," they mean it. These last two days I've had this vision of older men climbing the interior walls of their homes with fire in their bellies and blood on their minds. Most are far too disciplined to wreak physical havoc on the scumbags that are popping up, but that passion will fire whatever course of legal action is open to them.

Hang onto your hats. And speak up when this kind of ignorance and hatefulness pops up in your circle of influence.

**************************

And to end this on a brighter note... That potential Valour-IT donor I wrote about about awhile back is definitely serious and is making noises about a level of donation that would fund an endowment for Valour-IT. Keep me and the Soldiers' Angels leadership in your prayers. If this goes right, Valour-IT will become a fixture for as long as it is needed.

Read More......